Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
ir.bowen.edu.ng:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/1215
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Famutimi, Ranti F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oyelami, Olufemi M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ibitoye, Ayodeji O. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Awoniran, Olalekan M. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-01T13:12:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-01T13:12:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Famutimi, R. F., Oyelami, M. O., Ibitoye, A.O. and Awoniran O. M. (2023). “An empirical comparison of the performances of single structure columnar in-memory and disk-resident data storage techniques using healthcare big data”. J Big Data, 10 (25): 1-17. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | ir.bowen.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1215 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Healthcare data in images, texts and other unstructured formats have continued to grow exponentially while generating storage concerns. Even though there are other complexities, volume complexity is a major challenge for Disk-Resident technique in storage optimization. Hence, this research aimed to empirically compare the efficiency of Disk-Resident and In-Memory single structure database technique (as opposed to multiple structure In-Memory database), using descriptive and inferential big data analytical approaches. The essence was to discover a more cost-effective storage option for healthcare big data. Data from Nigerian Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) alongside sample patients’ history from Made-in-Nigeria Primary Healthcare Information System (MINPHIS) which included patients’ investigation, patients’ bio-data and patients’ diagnoses were the primary data for this research. An implementation of both Disk-Resident and single structure In-Memory resident data storage was carried out on these big data sources. After storage, each quantity of data items stored for different data items in Disk-Resident was then compared with that of single structure In-Memory resident system using size of items as comparison criteria and different analyses made. The results obtained showed that single structure In-Memory technique conserved up to 90.57% of memory spaces with respect to the traditional (common) Disk-Resident technique for text data items. This shows that with this In-Memory technique, an improved performance in terms of storage was obtained. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
dc.subject | Healthcare big data | en_US |
dc.subject | Disk-resident database | en_US |
dc.subject | Columnar in-memory-resident database | en_US |
dc.subject | Big data analytics | en_US |
dc.subject | Descriptive analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Big data volume complexity | en_US |
dc.title | An empirical comparison of the performances of single structure columnar in-memory and disk-resident data storage techniques using healthcare big data | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Computer Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Published Article.pdf | 2.16 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.