BOWEN logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: ir.bowen.edu.ng:8181/jspui/handle/123456789/1215
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFamutimi, Ranti F.-
dc.contributor.authorOyelami, Olufemi M.-
dc.contributor.authorIbitoye, Ayodeji O.-
dc.contributor.authorAwoniran, Olalekan M.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T13:12:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-01T13:12:38Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationFamutimi, R. F., Oyelami, M. O., Ibitoye, A.O. and Awoniran O. M. (2023). “An empirical comparison of the performances of single structure columnar in-memory and disk-resident data storage techniques using healthcare big data”. J Big Data, 10 (25): 1-17.en_US
dc.identifier.uriir.bowen.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1215-
dc.description.abstractHealthcare data in images, texts and other unstructured formats have continued to grow exponentially while generating storage concerns. Even though there are other complexities, volume complexity is a major challenge for Disk-Resident technique in storage optimization. Hence, this research aimed to empirically compare the efficiency of Disk-Resident and In-Memory single structure database technique (as opposed to multiple structure In-Memory database), using descriptive and inferential big data analytical approaches. The essence was to discover a more cost-effective storage option for healthcare big data. Data from Nigerian Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) alongside sample patients’ history from Made-in-Nigeria Primary Healthcare Information System (MINPHIS) which included patients’ investigation, patients’ bio-data and patients’ diagnoses were the primary data for this research. An implementation of both Disk-Resident and single structure In-Memory resident data storage was carried out on these big data sources. After storage, each quantity of data items stored for different data items in Disk-Resident was then compared with that of single structure In-Memory resident system using size of items as comparison criteria and different analyses made. The results obtained showed that single structure In-Memory technique conserved up to 90.57% of memory spaces with respect to the traditional (common) Disk-Resident technique for text data items. This shows that with this In-Memory technique, an improved performance in terms of storage was obtained.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare big dataen_US
dc.subjectDisk-resident databaseen_US
dc.subjectColumnar in-memory-resident databaseen_US
dc.subjectBig data analyticsen_US
dc.subjectDescriptive analysisen_US
dc.subjectBig data volume complexityen_US
dc.titleAn empirical comparison of the performances of single structure columnar in-memory and disk-resident data storage techniques using healthcare big dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Computer Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Published Article.pdf2.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.